​The Cure To AI Is More Learning (With AI)

Panos Siozos is CEO of LearnWorlds, a platform powering 12,000+ organizations worldwide. He has a PhD in edtech and 20+ years in e-learning.

getty

AI is changing work faster than anyone can keep up. For many leaders, the instinct is to wait before committing to organizational shifts. That’s sensible given the pace of change. Look at the flood of AI agents entering the market and how quickly yesterday’s assumptions about safeguards, workflows and feasibility became outdated.

But sensible isn't the litmus anymore. Speed is.

And the only tried-and-tested way to increase adaptability is to learn faster.​

Learning As Adaptation

From basic biological principles, learning is an adaptation mechanism. Fire burns, and you know not to do that again. It’s what allows you to adapt faster than your genes can encode. But now that AI is finding its way into almost every system we use, I wonder whether the fire is burning so fast we don’t even notice we've been burned. What happens when it burns even faster?

Many people say we’re still in the dial-up era of AI, yet it's become a basic requirement for most jobs with an internet connection. I think that’s right. You do need to know how to use AI, but setting that as your bar is wrong. Fluency in one model today will be irrelevant in six months, maybe less.

Instead, recruiters, L&D teams and job hunters need to be looking for something else. AI fluency shouldn’t be the bar. Adaptability should. You need to start looking for the metacognitive abilities that will help you and your company keep up with technology.

What are those skills? You need the capacity to recognize when your knowledge is becoming obsolete, the ability to identify gaps without being told they exist, the willingness to unlearn, to let go of what no longer works, and the judgment to know when to trust AI output and when to question it. These are the skills that compound over time.

There’s A Paradox At The Heart Of All This

The cure to AI disruption is learning—but AI is also disrupting learning itself.

Generative systems can now create full learning journeys in minutes: structured modules, assessments and simulations, well formatted and ready to go.

Used well, this is transformative. AI allows for infinite permutations. You can generate scenarios, rehearse decisions and test assumptions. It can create feedback loops previously impossible at scale. That’s extraordinary.

Used poorly, it produces professional-looking content that doesn't change performance. Watching a course doesn't build judgment. Completing a quiz doesn't build performance under pressure.​

The Illusion Of Progress

AI-generated learning can create the impression of progress. It feels structured, guided and efficient. But without standards, context and verification, it can become directionless. You can consume large amounts of material and still be unable to apply it in the field. That’s a design issue.

Worryingly, the illusion runs deeper. We’re already seeing entry-level roles shrink because AI agents can perform junior tasks. That’s an evolutionary dead end. If companies remove too many junior learning opportunities, they may discover in three years they've automated away the pipeline that produces future experts: engineers, creatives, managers and problem-solvers who only become valuable because they were given the chance to learn on the job.

Mistaking automation for progress is the same as thinking content consumption means capability—it feels like you're moving in the right direction, right up until you aren't.

The trouble is that most companies were already treating learning as an afterthought before AI arrived. It was incidental and compliance-driven—something you did once or twice a year. That wasn’t good enough before; now it’s existential.

If your product evolves continuously, your workforce must too. If your teams are shipping changes every week, your people must be learning every week. An organization without a learning strategy lacks an adaptation strategy. Learning has to become as critical to your infrastructure as AI is.

So, What Do You Do?

If learning is your adaptation strategy, then treat it like one. I wouldn't start by redesigning learning across the whole organization. I'd start by asking where AI is changing work fastest.

The first question I'd ask is: Where is our knowledge already becoming obsolete? Every organization has an answer. It might be customer conversations, product knowledge, internal processes or the way people are using new AI tools. That's where learning creates the greatest advantage because that's where people need to adapt first.

Next, think about where that knowledge lives. In my experience, it's rarely sitting in a training manual. It's with the engineers solving new technical problems, customer success teams hearing new questions and product teams responding to constant change. If their knowledge stays in meetings or Slack threads, the rest of the organization falls behind. Find simple ways to capture it while it's current.

AI also changes the economics of learning. When knowledge has a much shorter shelf life, waiting months to produce polished training doesn't make sense. I'd rather publish something useful this week, see how people use it and improve it continuously than aim for perfection while the work has already moved on.

Finally, don't mistake content for capability. If learning is about adaptation, then it doesn't matter whether someone completed a course. What matters is if they can make a better decision, solve a new problem or use a new tool more effectively than they could before. Think about how you can measure that.

None of this is about creating more learning for the sake of it. It's about helping organizations adapt at the same pace as the work itself. And that's a moving target.

Conclusion

We're all learning in real time, figuring it out every day. I might not agree with myself next week. But that's not a reason to wait. The models will improve. Simulations will become more realistic. Some constraints will narrow, making deliberate design more important, not less.

As I said at the beginning: Speed is now the litmus. And in this post-AI world, the worst thing you can be is late.

At least, I think I still believe that. Ask me again next week.

Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?