Why America's Digital Government Is Stuck Playing Whack-A-Mole—And How To Fix It

Brian Chidester is the Head of Global Strategy and Innovation—Public Sector at Adobe and an Award-Winning Podcast Host.

getty

Every time a new policy mandate lands, a state agency opens a new vendor contract. An accessibility deadline triggers an overlay tool. A security overhaul spawns another integration. A budget shift reshuffles priorities. The IT team is back at square one. It's whack-a-mole, played with public money and citizen trust.

The consequences are not abstract. Each new point solution adds another vendor relationship to manage, another integration to maintain, another layer of technical debt to carry forward indefinitely. State agencies routinely manage 12 or more vendor contracts simultaneously, and the burden of keeping those systems talking to each other consumes IT bandwidth that could otherwise go toward improving services. The problem is not that government IT teams lack skill or ambition. It is that the structure they operate within is designed to fail.

When Solving One Problem Creates Another

The clearest illustration is what has happened with digital accessibility. In 2026, digital self-service metrics improved as agencies invested in accessibility upgrades. But those same investments coincided with site performance drops, almost certainly because accessibility overlays and third-party add-ons were bolted onto existing infrastructure rather than built into it. Fix one problem, introduce another.

This pattern extends beyond accessibility. Document digitization shows the same gap between intent and reality. The public spends more than 10.5 billion hours each year completing government paperwork, according to our company's 2026 Digital Government Index. Yet no state portals currently offer strong digitized document and form capabilities. Most services still route residents through PDFs, paper or in-person steps. The infrastructure to change that hasn't been built coherently. It's been assembled piecemeal, one contract at a time, which is precisely why it doesn't work as a system.

There's a telling contradiction at the heart of most government digital strategies: Agencies invest heavily in the capability to use data, then rarely close the loop by studying how residents actually experience the result. Having a system isn't the same as understanding whether it works. Too often, the metrics tracked are the ones that are easy to measure rather than the ones that matter.

The diagnosis is familiar: Service delivery is fragmented across institutions, data standards are inconsistent, and feedback loops that capture how people experience services are frequently absent. This is not fundamentally a technology problem. It's a structural one.

Citizens Are Already Absorbing The Cost

It would be easier to tolerate this inefficiency if it were purely an internal IT headache. It isn't. Roughly half of residents who used digital government services last year found it difficult to navigate government platforms, according to Accenture. That number should be disqualifying on its own. Government digital services aren't optional experiences residents can opt out of when frustrated—they're often the only path to benefits, permits, licenses and critical public resources.

The downstream consequences are severe. According to the American Public Human Services Association, an estimated $30 billion in health and human services benefits goes unclaimed every year. This is not primarily because people don't know those benefits exist but because claiming them is technically accessible yet practically impossible for many to navigate. That's not a communications failure. That's a design failure.

What makes this particularly frustrating is that the gap between "visible" and "resolved" is where government digital experiences most consistently break down. According to our DGI, nine out of 10 state agencies have basic service listings and search functionality. Fewer than two in three offer an authenticated experience that remembers who a resident is. Only one in four have AI-assisted support. The infrastructure exists to show people a service is available. The infrastructure to actually help them complete it has not been built.

The Platform Question Is Now An AI Question

For years, the case for integrated platforms over point solutions was primarily about cost and efficiency. That case remains strong. Our report uncovered that organizations on integrated platforms report significantly lower total cost of ownership and faster speed to market for new services. But there's now a second dimension that makes the platform question more urgent: artificial intelligence.

Where data are well structured, consistently governed and routinely collected, AI applications are more likely to scale successfully. Where data are fragmented, incomplete or unevenly managed, AI deployment tends to be slower. This should give government IT leaders pause. Our report revealed that every state is currently exploring or deploying AI, and multiple states were recognized in late 2025 for AI applications already delivering measurable outcomes. But the foundational data infrastructure that makes AI reliable—including consistent metadata, strong domain authority, fast performance, coherent content management—is precisely what fragmented, point-solution architectures fail to deliver.

Put plainly: A government that hasn't solved its fragmentation problem cannot effectively deploy AI. The two issues aren't parallel tracks. One is a precondition for the other.

What Strategic Digital Government Actually Looks Like

The states that consistently perform best on digital experience measures share characteristics that have nothing to do with being early adopters of any particular technology. They've invested in shared infrastructure: single sign-on, unified content management, standardized workflows. They embed accessibility and compliance into publishing systems rather than patching it on afterward. And they treat digital government as an enterprise system to be designed and governed, not a collection of individual problems to be solved by whoever offers the most convenient vendor contract this quarter.

Modern government runs on shared digital foundations. Fragmented systems and siloed data keep innovation isolated and costly to scale. Leading organizations invest in interoperable platforms, common services and reusable components that can be recombined across missions—capabilities reused rather than rebuilt, allowing innovation to compound.

That's not a vision statement. It's a description of what the highest-performing government digital operations are already doing.

The current approach is not a technology strategy. It is the absence of one. And as AI raises the stakes for data quality and content coherence, the cost of continuing without one will only grow. The governments that serve residents best in the next decade won't be those that moved fastest on any single tool. They'll be the ones that finally stopped playing whack-a-mole.

Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?