Why Decision Intelligence May Change How Insurers Measure Success

Robert Clark is the founder and CEO of Cloverleaf Analytics, a leading provider of insurance decision intelligence solutions.

getty

​Insurers already track combined ratio, loss ratio, expense ratio, claims cycle time, retention, quote-to-bind and premium growth. Those metrics are essential, showing what happened after underwriting, claims, pricing and operational decisions have already been made.

The growing investment in AI, analytics and data modernization is raising a broader question: are traditional KPIs enough to show whether insurers are making faster, more consistent and effective decisions?

As insurers explore Insurance Decision Intelligence, some may begin reevaluating how they connect analytics investments to operational responsiveness, workflow efficiency, decision quality and business outcomes.

Not every decision intelligence measure can be captured directly by a single software platform today. Some can be tracked through analytics systems, including data freshness, processing speed, usage, adoption and alert activity. Others may require tighter integration with underwriting, claims, policy administration, CRM, customer experience or workflow systems.

The point is not that every insurer can measure every category perfectly today. The larger opportunity may be developing clearer ways to connect analytics investments to operational performance, decision processes and measurable business impact over time.

With that in mind, here are 10 measurement areas that could become increasingly important as insurers modernize analytics, workflow and AI capabilities.

1. Decision Velocity

Decision velocity to evaluate how quickly an insurer moves from a business trigger to confident action. J.D. Power Property Claims found that the average property claimant waits more than 44 days for final payment after FNOL; claims completed within 10 days scored 762 in satisfaction, while repairs taking more than 31 days scored 595. Faster decisions can protect customer trust, not just efficiency.

2. Data-To-Decision Lag

Data-to-decision lag to examine how long raw data takes to become usable in underwriting, claims, pricing, reporting or executive decisions. McKinsey Core Modernization notes that AI can improve productivity in insurance data mapping, conversion and quality work by 20% to 60%. In many organizations, the problem is not a lack of data. It is the delay between collecting information and making it usable.

3. Decision-Ready Data Confidence

Decision-ready data confidence could monitor whether key decisions are supported by accurate, complete, timely and trusted data. A WTW P&C Analytics report found that 42% of insurers cite data-related issues, including poor quality and limited accessibility, along with inadequate IT support, as significant analytics barriers. Speed without confidence can accelerate risk.

4. Automation Readiness

Automation readiness may determine which decisions or workflows could be completed with less manual intervention while still meeting risk, compliance and governance standards. Capgemini P&C found that only 8% of P&C insurers are implementing automated, data-driven recommendations or decisions in underwriting. The opportunity is not to automate every decision. It is to know which decisions can safely move faster and which still require human review.

5. Exception And Escalation Visibility

Exception and escalation visibility to show where decisions fall outside standard workflows and require manual review, supervisor input or special handling. Capgemini P&C reported that underwriters spend 41% to 43% of their time on administrative activities, while only 32% to 33% goes to core work such as risk assessment, premium calculation and book management. If every process requires a workaround, the issue may be decision design.

6. Decision Consistency

Decision consistency to explore whether similar risks, claims, renewals or submissions are handled consistently across teams, regions, books of business and systems. A 2026 WTW Performance report found North American P&C insurers with more sophisticated analytics achieved combined ratios six percentage points lower and premium growth three percentage points higher than slower adopters from 2022 to 2024. Consistency is disciplined decision quality at scale.

7. Insight Adoption

Insight adoption would look at whether analytics-generated alerts, recommendations, models or dashboard insights are actually used by business users. Deloitte Gen AI Insurance found that failed Gen AI implementations in insurance are often tied to lack of business-line support, weak data and AI foundations, legacy infrastructure and poor business-technology collaboration. A dashboard may inform the business, but only adopted insights change behavior.

8. Fraud Signal Effectiveness

Fraud signal effectiveness to determine the quality of fraud alerts, including hit rate, false positives, investigation conversion, avoided loss and speed to detection. Deloitte Fraud AI projects the fraud-detection technology market could grow from $4 billion in 2023 to $32 billion by 2032, and indicates P&C insurers could reduce fraudulent-claim losses by US$80 billion to US$160 billion by 2032. More alerts are not the goal. Better routing and prioritization are.

9. Decision Outcome Lift

Decision outcome lift could link better decisions to business improvement, such as loss ratio improvement, quote conversion, retention lift, premium growth, reduced leakage or lower operating expense. A 2025 EY Global Insurance Outlook report cites a 10% to 25% increase in operating profits for insurers with successful data and analytics strategies. This is often hardest to measure because it requires both analytics visibility and business-process measurement.

10. Customer Decision Experience

Customer decision experience to gauge how internal decisions show up to customers through speed, clarity, transparency, communication and digital ease. A 2025 J.D. Power Digital Claims report found that 52% of auto and homeowners customers who rated their digital claims experience “poor” or “just OK” were likely to leave or not renew; among those rating it “excellent” or “perfect,” only 4% were at risk of attrition. Customers do not experience an insurer’s data architecture. They experience the decisions that architecture enables.

Is Your Insurance Business Decision-Ready?

Traditional insurance KPIs will always matter. As insurers invest more heavily in AI, analytics and modernization, they need better ways to trace business outcomes back to the data, workflows, adoption patterns and decisions that created them.

The next stage of insurance analytics will not be won by the carrier with the most dashboards, reports or data sources. It will be won by the carrier that can connect data, workflow, adoption and outcomes into a measurable decision system.

Modern insurers should ask not only whether they are data-driven, but whether they are decision-ready.​

Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?